Choosing model organism is a complex task, some of the part we did before using the protein sequence similarity. Let evaluate the possible model organisms from the whole genome view. Particularly taking into account that practically no one gene act along, on contrary usually there is a cluster of genes working together, and in many cases they are located close to each other on the genome. Let's do some research to find out about other genes related to your gene and the disease it involves.

1. Locate your gene in humangenome, choose the latest build. On which chromosome and over which positions it is found?

2. Whichgenes lie within close distance of the your gene? Find at least 10 closely locates genes. Find an image of the genome in that region showing the gene locations. List all the genes.

3. Explore each gene. Based on the known functions of these genes, which would be the most plausible candidate(s) for the disease associated with your gen, and can be also a target for the mutation and why? There can be several, depending on there functional relations to the disease and to your gene; choose best two. These genes together with your gene will be your test set.

4. Evaluate the quality of each gene in your test set. How was the intron/exon structure of these genes determined? Given your answer, should we have high confidence that the gene's structure is annotated correctly? (Hint: The mapview entry for the mRNAs of the gene will have details about the source of the sequence.)

5. Using genome browser (UCSC Genome Browser will be better for this task) identify best model organism, which can represent all the genes in your test set and also intergenic regions. Locate every gene from your selected list in the genomes and plot the region, setting the "RefSeq Genes," "Other RefSeq," "N-SCAN," and "Conservation" tracks to "full". (Hint: The resulting picturesfor each gene may look like the one on the lecture slide with conservation.)

6. We would expect that introns will evolve more quickly than exons,and therefore we can find likely exon positions by looking for more conserved nucleotides. Based on your plot for problem 5, does conservation within the organisms at the base level provide support for the specific exon locations in the gene model? Why or why not?

7. Again looking at your plot from problem 5, what organism provides the best evidence from conservation for or against the specific human gene structure model?

8. Based on the conservation you can observe here, roughly when in the evolution of modern organisms does the exon structure appear to have emerged for this gene? (For example, did it emerge after primates separated from other mammals but before monkeys diverged from great apes? Did it emerge after placental mammals separated from marsupials but before primates separated from other placental mammals?) Justify your answer in a sentence or so by reference to evidence from the conservation of the gene across species.

9. If we suspect that the genes in your test set might be alternatively spliced, then we can look for evidence in other organisms for alternative splicing of the homologous gene. Use one organism as a more distant homolog for which good experimental data is likely to be available. How many experimentally observed splice forms are there for your genes in this organism? Do they correspond well with the exon model annotated for the human gene? If available, please use the model organism database.

10. We might decide that the best way to resolve the true splice form(s) is to do our own sequencing of the modeltranscriptome and see mRNAs appear for this gene and what models they support. Suppose we have the option of using an Illumina sequencer or a 454 sequencer. What would be the relative advantages and disadvantages of each for this purpose?

Bonus question. Using available resources identify new genes related to the disease, your gene related to, but located not in close proximity like in the above exercise, but in other place(s) and may be even in other chromosomes. You can use either human or model organisms or both. Provide convincing evidence.