Write a 3-4 page research paper based on article attached?
Given the Article is: "Determining Nurses' Readiness for EBP"
The levels of evidence answer the type of question you are asking and then questions 1-6 are 2 in that section and you need to incorporate the two tables into that section. Tables are listed below after the questions that need to be answered.
Questions:
1. Do the authors have the appropriate clinical and educational credentials for this research study? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this research team?
2. Is there evidence of any conflict of interest that might introduce bias into the way the study is designed or the way the results are viewed? Do the authors have any potential to realize a financial gain from the results of this study?
3. What is the evidence that this journal is peer-reviewed? Find the home page of this journal on the Web. Does the journal have an editorial board?
4. Does the journal have anything to gain by publishing positive or negative results from this study?
5. Is there evidence of bias in the way the study was designed or implemented? If so, how does it affect the nurses' use of these data in the practice setting?
6. Appraise the level of evidence this research study provides the nurse and the strength of the recommendation for practice provided by the results.
(Houser, 20131031, p. 27)
Houser, J. (20131031). Nursing Research: Reading, Using and Creating Evidence, 3rd Edition [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9781284055702
Table 1.4 : Rating Systems for Grading Levels of Evidence
|
Level of Rating
|
Type of Study
|
|
Level I
|
Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported as meta-analysis, systematic review, or meta-synthesis, with results that consistently support a specific intervention or treatment
Randomized trials with large sample sizes and large effect sizes
|
|
Level II
|
Evidence from well-designed controlled studies, either randomized or nonrandomized, with results that consistently support a specific intervention or treatment
|
|
Level III
|
Evidence from studies of intact groups
Ex-post-facto and causal-comparative studies
Case-control or cohort studies
Evidence obtained from time series with and without an intervention
Single experimental or quasi-experimental studies with dramatic effect sizes
|
|
Level IV
|
Evidence from integrative reviews
Systematic reviews of qualitative or descriptive studies
Theory-based evidence and expert opinion
Peer-reviewed professional organization standards with supporting clinical studies
|
Table 1.5 The Link Between Evidence and Recommendations for Practice
|
Type of Evidence
|
Clear Evidence of Benefit or Harm
|
Benefit and Harm Are Balanced
|
|
Well-designed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or reports of multiple RCTs
|
Strong recommendation for or against the intervention.
|
Action is optional.
|
|
RCTs with limitations of quasi-experimental studies
|
Recommendation for or against the intervention.
|
Action is optional.
|
|
Observational and descriptive studies, case controls, and cohort designs
|
Recommendation for or against the intervention.
|
Action is optional.
|
|
Expert opinion, case studies
|
Action is optional.
|
No recommendation for or against the intervention.
|
Source: Reproduced with permission from Pediatrics, Vol. 114, pages 874-877. Copyright (c) by the AAP. American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement: Classifying Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Reprinted by permission of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
(Houser, 20131031, p. 24)
Houser, J. (20131031). Nursing Research: Reading, Using and Creating Evidence, 3rd Edition [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9781284055702
Attachment:- Determining Nurses' Readiness for EBP faculty assignment.rar