Where do the writers disagree about the facts or the interpretation of the facts?

Where do the writers disagree about underlying beliefs, values, or assumptions?

What forms of persuasion are being used? How are the authors' each using pathos, logos, and ethos in their arguments?

What was left out of the arguments, either because the author might not have wanted you to

know, or because the author was not thorough? How did this affect your response to the argument?

Just one page