Use only this book as a source: (Philosophy of language: the big problems edited by Andrea Nye). prepare three essays, each between 2 and 5 pages in length.
Part I: Locke's theory of meaning describe Locke's theory of how words have meaning. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this theory? Is Locke's view an ex of what Hilary Putnam calls a "magical theory of reference?" describe your answer and argue for or against Locke's theory of meaning.
Part II: Frege's theory of meaning describe Frege's theory of sense and meaning (reference). What are Fregean senses? How do senses differ from ideas and from physical objects? How does Frege aregue that proper names have senses? What are the strengths and weaknesses of Frege's theory? Critically compare Frege's theory to Locke's. Argue for the advantages of one theory over the other.
Part III: Function vs. Structure John Dewey presents a functional view of language as an instrument for the social coordination of behavior. Emil Beneviste argues generally against functional theories of language. What is at issue in this debate? Critically compare and contrast the views of these thinkers about the relation between the structural and functional features of language.
Argue for the advantages of one view over the other. -Take care of citation and avoid plagiarism. -APA Style.