The English Department notes that for the third major paper in Composition I, the textual analysis, each student "will prepare a 3-5 page analysis of a text (print, visual, cultural). Students will craft a thesis-driven analytical essay that demonstrates substantial understanding of the rhetorical strategies used in a text and an ability to examine, critique, and interrogate those strategies." Such an essay will need to clearly identify a text to discuss, articulate a thesis identifying either the assumptions about audience the text makes or underlying aspects of the preparer's contexts of writing, and reinforce that thesis through ample and appropriate textual and paratextual data from primary-and textual data from secondary-sources, and through exacting explanations of the same.

Textual analyses allow for in-depth investigation of a given piece of text (variously defined), explicating its devices and their effects individual and cumulative. They offer insight into how the many things that can be called texts serve to create and reinforce ideas, explicitly and implicitly, and they can be used to reveal truths about the creators and contexts of the texts, helping to promote understanding of people and groups of them.

The English Department notes that students successfully completing the assignment will prove themselves able to do the following:
analyze and adequately summarize the chosen text, with appropriate attention given to context and rhetorical situation
craft an analytical thesis that clearly states the interpretation or judgment of the text
support the thesis with reasonable and well-paragraphed evidence
create a strong title and citations appropriate for a single source paper
create an effective introduction and conclusion, and clear transitions between main ideas use appropriate tone and language for an academic audience
appropriately cite source(s)
evidence clear, well-edited writing that is free of proofreading errors and errors of grammar, mechanics, and syntax
Development of the listed abilities should be paramount in your mind as you work on the textual analysis. Being able to articulate a clear, coherent idea and support it from specific, detailed evidence in a way that makes evident the means of support is helpful in many endeavors. To do so with a minimum of errors helps you to appear educated, competent, and trustworthy, all of which will be to your benefit.

Guidelines for Text Selection
The text for this exercise must be chosen from the Opinion section of the New York Times (either in print or online), including pieces by columnists, editorials, op-ed and Opinionator pieces, pieces from the Sunday Review, pieces from Taking Note, Topics pieces, and videos, but excluding letters to the editor. The text must be recent; its publication date may not be earlier than 23 February 2014. Students are strongly encouraged to discuss their selections with the instructor to ensure that they are treating texts of sufficient heft and content to bear sustained analysis and that they are asserting a thesis appropriately responsive to the assignment. Students desiring to treat other texts may petition the instructor in that regard; decisions regarding alternative texts will be made on a case-by-case basis, but analyses of texts not from the Opinion section of the New York Times and not approved by the instructor are subject to summary failure.

Submission Guidelines
Drafts for early review are due in advance of the submission draft, so that problems in the profiles may be addressed and strengths enhanced. A hard-copy, typed version of the draft is due at the beginning of class on 7 March 2014 so that it may be reviewed during class time by a classmate; it will be taken as a 10-point minor assignment. An online version must be submitted to the instructor as a .doc, .docx, or .rtf document via D2L before the beginning of class time on 14 March 2014; it will also be taken as a 10-point minor assignment. Both drafts will benefit from being completed or nearly-completed papers; the more work done in advance, the more commentary is possible, and the more use you can derive from those comments. Please be sure to take the comments on early drafts seriously and correct problems in the text as it appears in those early drafts, as it is only in those drafts that revision is possible. 

Required minimum-6 page