In each of the arguments below, the premises monadically imply the conclusion. Show this by monadically schematizing the arguments (assuming a UD of persons), and then arguing that any interpretation that makes all of the premise schemata true must also make the conclusion schemata true (or by arguing that any interpretation that makes the conclusion schema false must make at least one of the premise schema false).

Premise 1: Everyone involved in the recent crime spree is a professor.
Premise 2: If no professors are criminally insane, then none of the inmates are professors.
Conclusion: If any of the inmates are involved in the recent crime spree, then some professors are criminally insane.