Heraclitus concluded that everything is "becoming", or that everything is in a state of flux. Parmenides concluded reality is Being, one thing which is motionless, eternal etc. Compare their conclusions with the ideas of Plato in the divided line and myth of the cave. With which, Parmenides or Heraclitus, is Plato's view of knowledge (not his view of belief/opinion) more closely aligned? What are your reasons for your conclusion? Explain yourself fully.