CSS may have a code base, but if you look at it from the perspective of its end result, it is quite artistic. Through CSS, you can augment typography, fonts, headings, layouts, colour schemes and more. However, all of these examples are merely parts of an overall whole. A piece of typography might be good, but if the surrounding design is sloppy, it makes little difference to the overall site aesthetic. Examples of such sloppiness are misaligned graphical elements, inconsistent typefaces or poorly adjusted displays (e.g., a site looks tiny on a high screen resolution).
In order to ensure individual elements of a site design are clean, precise and aligned properly, CSS makes use of various units of measurement: points, pixels, ems and percentages. However, why have so many? The truth of the matter is that each unit of measurement is situational, meaning there are times when one is better than another. For this Discussion, identify and evaluate these situations when each noted unit is the best choice in a Web design.
To complete this Discussion:
Post: Create an initial post in which you evaluate the situations in which it is best to use point size, pixels, ems or percentages as the unit of measurement in CSS. Provide at least one example for each unit of measurement and explain the reasoning behind your evaluations. You may also wish to provide screenshots or images that better illustrate your points.
Respond: Respond to your colleagues by comparing your evaluations. Provide additional situations where you think certain units of measurement in CSS are optimal. Again, you may provide screenshots or images to support your claims.
This should be 600-700 words without plagiarism