The assignment has three parts.
First part, writing article review (http://edglossary.org/professional-development/), it should be one page(see details in the attachement, for citation see just the first line).

the second part, implication of staff developement by author and your reaction to the articles(see details
in the attachment) also this part should be one page.

The third part, writing mini paper consistent of reactionary essay commensurate with same topic may be referenced, but in large part represent defensible and views. mini paper should be 1 page.

Total three pages(double space, font size 12 (times new Roman).

The Article review will consist of the following components:

Citation: The Reference will be posted in the subject line, as well as within the Article Review itself. Please review the suggested steps for "staking your claim" to an article within the previous discussion related to Article reviews(ie., 1. Select article, 2. Post citation within subject line, 3. "edit" posting at a later time to include the article evaluation...).

Summary of article: Summary provides an overview of the article. This is generally one (1) page in length. The reader should understand the author's perspective by reading the summary. A cover page is not necessary.

Implications of staff development by author: What are the implications of the author's positions regarding staff development?

Your reaction to the article: *This is the MOST important part of the review. Saying that you did not like to article will not suffice. Please include substantial reasons (and other references) supporting why you agree or disagree with the author's position(s).