Question: This is the second half of last week''s assignments.

This assignment is designed to get you used to preparing proposal evaluation documents, and in using those documents to evaluate various vendor proposals. This is a 'common sense' exercise, and there is no template in the book for you to use.

Review the documents attached to this assignment, and the RFP.

The documents attached to this assignment are the responses of the two companies to the RFP.

Use these documents, and the RFP Scoresheet below, to evaluate the responses. You may modify the spreadsheet if you find it doesn't do the job.

Based on your evaluation, select a winning proposal.

Write a half-page executive summary, describing why you thought the winning proposal was best.

Focus

The decision recommendation of the paper is clear.One main point clearlycontrolsthe entire paper, and the scope is manageable given the length of the paper and the nature of the assignment. The point is meaningful because it deals with an issue that the audience would likely consider important.

Development and Support

The reasoning behind the paper's decision recommendation is clearly and logically developed.The paper reflects sound reasoning, and the information is accurate. The decision-maker should respect if not agree with the paper's logic. The decision recommendation isclearly explained through concrete, specific details. The support is tailored to suit the audience.

Organization

High The presentation order is clear and logical, with the recommended decision leading all other items.The paper does not wander into areas that are not part of or in support of, the recommendation.

Mechanics

The paper conforms to accepted conventions of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization in a variety of sentence lengths and types. A few minor errors may appear, buton the whole the paper follows accepted_conventions. Readers will rarely if ever pay more attention to the paper's mechanics than to its ideas.

Attachment:- Assignment.rar