Instructions:

Re-write the following sentences-they need to be accurate, clear, and concise. You must use active voice and parallel structure.

1. By only adding her name and leaving him out, the quality of the research is good and research quality is the reason why the consultant was hired.

2. By staying quiet in this situation may not affect the consultant in a bad way but in a great way.

3. The consultant is in battle with his conscience he does not know whether to expose or stay quiet.

4. 4. The consultant should expose the engineer for her wrongful actions, because it is why he was hired in the first place and going against the job's expectation and ethics is not right.

5. If the consultant wishes to expose the engineer he can solve a major issue when leads to increasing the strength of his reputation.

6. The group could possibly lose their drive to complete the project depending on that person's effect on the group.

7. In any choice this person makes it is important that you get the facts, understand everyone's interest, and document everything pertaining to the issue.

8. You could be looked at as unprofessional and miss out on other opportunities from your manufacturing company.

9. Concealing her unethical behavior could glad to both the interns and the engineers being appreciative of his participation in the project instead of creating a hostile work environment.

10. It avoids a waste of money which is what will happen if the research is shut down due to the consultant's inability to focus on his main purpose of simply assessing the research.

11. It then open new doors of opportunity to him.

12. However, keeping quiet could also lead to a disaster, because if later on it is realized that the details of the research is the intellectual property of the intern.

13. The person who will be mostly affected by this is the consultant because his jobs are based on contracts which rely on getting good recommendation from previous customers, which will be also impossible if he is exposed to the public.

14. Standing on viewpoint of the consultant's career, to be quiet and pretend nothing happened is the best way to deal with this event.

15. If the consultant has any altercations with the engineer, this will only delay his project time and will reflect poorly on him causing him to stress and not focus.

16. Since the consultant is assessing the quality of research, one could argue that he serves as a supervisor to these engineers and their interns only for these four months.

17. Keeping quiet also has its downsides too such as the consultant feeling terrible about hiding it because it is morally and ethically wrong.

18. The consultant has to take into consideration what would be the advantages and disadvantages of revealing the details to the management.

19. The exposure that the consultant has given to the engineer would only make the engineer a better worker since it would show her that everybody makes errors and that errors should not define her.

20. The consultant is trapped between making the moral decision of exposing the engineer so the intern can get full credit for this work or remain silent in order not to lose the trust of the engineers.

21. His other issue, the breach of ethics by not exposing the engineer, has negative impacts that go beyond a violation of his moral code.