Ask Project Management Expert

In the early morning hours of October 21, 1973, a truck collided with a power pole adjacent to a twolane asphalt highway outside the corporate limits of Bellaire, Ohio. The collision severed the pole in half, severely damaged the truck, and shut off electrical power in the vicinity. Alvin E. Mayer, a working foreman, and Kenneth Dawson, an area foreman, were reached at their home and together they traveled in one of the company's 35 ft. elbow trucks to the scene to restore electric service and to remove the pole butt which was then blocking the road.

Dawson and Mayer arrived upon the scene at approximately 1:30 AM and brought their truck to a halt in the eastbound lane of the road just west of the accident scene. Meanwhile word of the power failure had reached a striking employee, Joseph Campbell, who lived nearby. Campbell and two other striking employees, Larry Campbell and Gabriel Gasbarre, drove to the scene, arriving there in advance of the company truck bringing Mayer and Dawson. Shortly before, Joseph Campbell had an unsatisfactory telephone conversation with the dispatcher on duty in the company offices in an effort to find out what had happened and what was being done to correct the power shutoff.

The three strikers brought picket signs with them, but upon arrival, decided to leave them in the car.... According to Mayer, following a conversation between himself and Joseph Campbell in the middle of the road, Mayer turned toward the accident scene only to have Campbell grab him from behind and throw him to the ground, Mayer falling on his left side but sustaining only a scraped elbow and [a scraped] small finger. In contrast, Joseph Campbell claimed that the two men were talking when Campbell slipped down off the truck and collided "chest-to-chest" with Mayer, causing him to slip and fall on gravel which had accumulated on the pavement. Mayer and Dawson reported the incident to the company that night, and thereafter a letter was sent to Joseph Campbell notifying him that he was ischarged for an "act of unprovoked aggression against a supervisor."

The company contends that Campbell's conduct was sufficiently serious to warrant discharge. The company notes that it is undisputed that at the time when the repair truck arrived on the scene, Campbell left the group of onlookers and began talking to Mayer about how thin his patience was growing, and that the exchange between the two men was heated. Further ... it is undisputed that Campbell came down from the fender of the repair truck where he was sitting and collided with Mayer, knocking Mayer backwards and onto the ground. Further, Campbell thereafter attempted to interfere with efforts to remove the broken utility pole and reopen the blocked highway to traffic, until directed to refrain by a police officer at the scene. We begin our analysis by noting our standard of review ... on this point: [N]ot every impropriety committed during [Section 7] activity places the employee beyond the protective shield of the act.

The employee's right to engage in concerted activity may permit some leeway for impulsive behavior, which must be balanced against the employer's right to maintain order and respect.... We have recognized in many cases that an employer is not required to countenance all misconduct by an employee, and we have carefully examined the acts of the employee to determine whether they are beyond the pale of protected activity under Section 7.... We conclude that Campbell's misconduct was sufficiently serious to justify his dismissal....

The supervisors were engaged in emergency repair work at approximately 1:30 AM. When the truck arrived, Campbell left the area where the other strikers and the onlookers were gathered and jumped up on the fender of the company's truck. The record indicates that at this point the two supervisors had just begun to survey the area where the accident had occurred, and did not as yet know whether there were any downed power lines or live wires. According to Campbell's own testimony, he began a discussion with Mayer stating how his patience was getting thin. Apparently, Campbell's statements angered Mayer because at this point Mayer came at Campbell and as Campbell arose from the truck, the two men bumped "chest-to-chest."

The force of the collision knocked Mayer back and he slipped onto the ground. He sustained slight injuries from the fall. Although there was no evidence that either man had to be restrained subsequent to the bumping incident, onlookers apparently considered the situation quite serious. Police Officer Warnock testified that immediately after Mayer fell, he came over to Campbell and told him to back away, so there would not be any trouble.... [The Court found that as a result, the Company was within its rights to discharge Campbell.] The facts leading to Larry Greene's discharge are in most respects undisputed.

On August 10, 1973, Greene and two other strikers were walking to picket the site of a repair job being performed by the company in Steubenville. As Greene and the others reached the southeast corner of the intersection of North and 4th Streets, a company truck which had just left the worksite stopped for a red light at the intersection. In it were line foreman Ross Lee Cunningham and working foreman Walt Williams. Cunningham was driving.

Greene yelled "Don't you know we're on strike?" and made some comments that the two non-union men were not observing safety rules. Greene then ran out into the intersection, grabbed Cunningham's cigar from his mouth and threw it to the ground. Based solely upon this incident, Greene was discharged. The conduct complained of was an isolated expression which did not upon the circumstances create a safety hazard jeopardizing either company equipment or personnel.

At the time of his discharge Greene was the Recording Secretary for the Union and the evidence suggests that the incident was exaggerated and that Greene's discharge for the alleged misconduct was pretextual.... [The Court held that] Greene's admitted misconduct was not so serious as to justify his discharge...

Case Questions

1. What balancing test does the court employ in determining whether an employee's act of violence justifies the employee's dismissal?

2. Why does the court find that Greene's dismissal was not justified?

Project Management, Management Studies

  • Category:- Project Management
  • Reference No.:- M92035917

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Project Management

Presentation and written assessment -the argumentative

Presentation and Written Assessment - The argumentative essay must be 1500 words in length. The presentation is about 10-15 minutes long depending on the size of the group. Task Description: The objective of this assignm ...

Topic - identifying the ways to overcome the communication

Topic - Identifying the ways to overcome the communication barriers of international project management students at central Queensland University. Literature review (1000 words) References would be needed in this section ...

Case study continuous improvementintroductionprecision

Case study: Continuous Improvement Introduction Precision Engineering Works Private Limited (PEW) is an original equipment manufacturer specialising in plastic moulding parts for the telecommunication industry. They have ...

Advanced project risk managementaimthe aim of this

Advanced Project Risk Management Aim: The aim of this assignment is to: demonstrate the understanding of Decision Tree/Expected Monetary Value and the use of the software Precision Tree schedule a project using Oracle Pr ...

Critical analysis reportthis is a group assessment for face

Critical Analysis Report This is a group assessment for face to face students and individual assessment for distance students The primary purpose of this assessment is to help you to develop and demonstrate your skills i ...

Project managment1explain what is meant by the following

Project managment 1. Explain what is meant by the following: "The project scope statement should not be built in isolation." 2. Discuss project management related problems created due to "scope creep." Each question shou ...

Project management for business assignment -enabling a

Project Management for Business Assignment - Enabling a Customer-Centric Experience through Project Management (Case Study Adapted from Project Management Institutes) Organization: Du Telecom and Huawei Technologies Co. ...

Principles of project management minor case study

Principles of Project Management Minor Case Study Assignment - Assignment objective - You are required to investigate a Project Management scenario, using information given to develop a written report and presentation to ...

Project management assessment - research studypurpose of

Project Management Assessment - Research Study Purpose of the assessment - Develop skills in Project communication planning. Communication is Key to Successful Project Management. The cases illustrate different approache ...

Assessmentthis assignment involves the portfolio of

Assessment This assignment involves the Portfolio of Materials and Team Charter 1. Description and justification of the innovation process used. A 1-page plan/outline that explains how social media will be used A short b ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As