You've seen how the Court in Ozark changed the airline's height requirement for pilots. In Hollywood Ceramics you saw that the Board was flip-flopping over when to step in and control what went on between unions and employers vis a vis union representation. Courts have gotten into when employers can and can't discriminate against minorities, when employers can pay men on a night shift more than women on a day shift, whether or not a medical school can reserve openings for minority students, etc., etc., etc. My question for you is this: How much power should the courts have in affecting the relationship between employers and employees? This country was built on the philosophy of Laissez Faire.... leave them alone. Under that philosophy, we built railroads, skyscrapers and a vast industrial economy that has made us the envy of the industrial world. Entrepreneurs were able to get rich or go broke based on their own talent and luck, and workers could choose their professions and become successful by their own hard work. On the other hand, entrepreneurs became fabulously wealthy on the backs on the workers. Miners were routinely killed in dangerous mining conditions so the owners could become even wealthier. There was a case in the 1920's in which a young boy was required to work late at night cleaning machines. He spilled a little cleaning fluid, and it dripped on a mouse hiding under the machine. The mouse ran under a gas radiator. The flame of the radiator caused the mouse to catch on fire, and it ran under the machine which blew up due to the flammable fluid being used to clean. The boy was killed; The employer hired another boy to take his place. No, I didn't make that up. Under what circumstances, and to what degree, should the government be able to step in and dictate the relationship between an employer and employee?