What were the two legal issues in this case? What did the court agree? For each matter try to write using a brief version of the IRAC (Issue-Rule-Application-Conclusion) technique explained in the Course Syllabus. There will be two IRAC examines one for each issue. You will not be classified on your success, but your attempt will safeguard that you cover the issues adequately. Lastly what do you think will be the final outcome of this case? Was it obvious fairly in your opinion? Why or why not?