Shelly admits Corelli's offer. Presumptuous that the contract has met all of the supplies for a valid contract. The question is Corelli was a slight when he purchased the painting. Is the contract void? Is it voidable? What is the difference among these two concepts? A month subsequently his eighteenth birthday Corelli agrees that he would rather have $2,500 than the painting. He informs shelly that he is disaffirming the contract as well as request that shelly returned the $2,500 to him. When shelly declines to do so, Corelli bring a court action to recover the $2,500. What will the court probable agree in this situation? Why?