Topic: Conflict of tort laws international.

Outline:

1. Introduction

. International law- rules and regulations governing interactions between states

Ø . Choice of rules for Tort is towards selecting the lex cause to be able to find out the nature and scope of judicial remedy to claim damages.

Ø . Resolving a tort case on more than one jurisdiction has not been easy

Ø Case: Need for Reform on both sides of the Tasman.

Ø Purpose

· To discuss the Australian court latest methods to solve a tort case

· To find out a way forward for Australian and New Zealand courts in the area

2. Discussion/ Body

Ø Reference on North American jurisprudence in the area

Ø Apply law of place of wrong as the choice of law rule

3. Discuss the Philips v Eyre approach

Ø In order to bring an action in one country for a wrong done abroad, the wrong must be of a character that it would make it actionable if committed in the country where the action is brought.

4. Discuss the law of forum

Ø It should recognize the action for it to proceed in a jurisdiction

5. Flexibility- other approaches

Ø Proper law of the Tort

Ø Interest analysis

6. Conclusion

Ø Law of place of wrong is only law to applicable in torts in relation to international torts.

Ø High court of Australia rejected double action ability.

Ø New Zealand still use law of double action ability but should too reject the approach and adopt the law of place of wrong.

Ø Law of forum is not required to provide recovery of any matter as a start up in jurisdiction.

Ø Australian High court should adopt a flexible exception.

My paper should be a minimum of 21 pages.

I need a good summary paper beside the work.

Please use Microsoft Word.
Please use 12-point Times New Roman as your font for all type in your text (8 point for footnotes).

Please double space pages with 1-inch margins.

Indent the first line of each paragraph using a tab, not the space bar.

Please do not insert an extra line of space between each paragraph.