Three salesmen worked for Sentient Jet, a small luxury airline charter service. They signed a non-compete agreement, promising to not go to work for a competing employer within a year after working for Sentient and also agreeing to not take any confidential information with them when they left the firm. When there was a change in the CEO of their firm, and talk of the company being bought out, the employees left the firm and went to work for Apollo Jets, a competitor, and allegedly took proprietary information with them that allowed them to solicit former Sentient clients. The plaintiff sought an injunction to ban the employees from working for a competitor for a year and also sought damages. The defendants argued that material changes in circumstances should have made the agreement not to compete unenforceable. How do you think the jury decided in this case?