There are 3 types of contract performance: complete, substantial and material breach. Describe the differences (and similarities) among the three, and describe some of the legal ramifications for one or more of these types of performances. (For ex, what happens if one party performs completely but the other party performs only substantially?) Give exs from outside readings or experiences in your career or personal business life. Applying those theories to the case at hand, would Ben be successful in seeking specific performance from Joe if Joe tried to get out of the contract?