The Crisis of The European Sciences.

I'm having a difficulty forming a clear argument based on Husserl's, The Crisis of The European Sciences, writings. I'm writing a short paper regarding his views on objective-science ought to fail explaining our reality based on his model of life-world. I udnerstand that he isn't saying that we should totally disregard science, but since it doesn't count for relative-subjective experience and purely rely on instrumental reasoning, it can't successfully explain our world. I am having a difficulty forming a clear argument and its premises. I'm mainly focusing on the first part of his writings (about the first 55 pages). Thanks

Please provide a clear argument and expand on it with few comments and notes, also include some possible premises ofr the argument. The argument is evolved around the support of scientific method and arguing against the need explained in his writings for objective-relative experience to obtain knowledge that explains our reality.