The case you are to use is in the

Antitrust laws are designed to promote competition. Outside of college athletics, economic competition is considered good for society. Not so inside the world of the NCAA, which kept a stranglehold on competition for decades.

However, in the past few years, there have been a number of landmark cases that have nibbled around the edges of NCAA rules and bylaws that limit competition, including the O'Bannon case, which found that student-athletes were entitled to compensation when their likenesses are used commercially.

Go online - you cannot use a case from the textbook - and find an antitrust case against the NCAA. Briefly describe the case, including the parties' respective legal arguments (i.e., the specific statutes that are being challenged), and then tell us whether you agree with the court's decision, if the case has already been decided, or what you expect the court's decision to be if the case is still in the court system.

NOTE: Students are not allowed to use a case that has already been used by a fellow student.

Be sure to:

1) use and define the legal terms/phrases that apply;

2) include a minimum of two internet references;

3) properly cite and reference all sources using APA format;

4) you are required to post substantial responses to at least two classmates'.

MUST BE 275-350 words