Question #1 300words
Submit Assignment: Discussing Your Results
While the results are the meat of your research paper, the discussion is the gravy. As meat without gravy may be dry and bland, results without discussions are meaningless. In this week's assignment, you will write the discussion section of your study conclusions.
Part One: Create an outline of the final section of your paper, using the conclusion section of the research study outline, posted in this week's resources, as a guide.
Part Two: Using this week's resources and your outline as a guide, summarize and interpret your major findings in relation to the literature and your theoretical framework.
Question #2 300words
Post Discussion: Interpreting Outcomes
In this week's readings, you learned that there are several elements required for the final section of your research paper. The first and most important of these elements is a discussion of your results. This discussion includes a summary and interpretation of your important findings.
As part of the interpretation, you will evaluate your findings in relation to your theoretical framework and previous studies included in your literature review.
Using this week's resources, respond to the following:
1. Discuss how the results of your study relates to the extant literature and your chosen theory.
2. Explain the implications, were your results to refute previous findings and/or your theoretical framework.
3. Provide a rationale for the difference or similarities you identified.
Question #3 300words
Post Discussion: Research Misconduct
In this week's reading, "Scientists Behaving Badly," you learned of the multiple opportunities researchers have to engage in academic misconduct. Consider the article and your current and future research opportunities in your response to the following.
1. What new perspectives did you form after reading the article?
2. What could you do to ensure you conduct ethical research and prevent the behaviors listed in the article in your own professional practice?
3. Are some forms of academic misconduct less egregious than others? Provide detail.
4. Describe a situation where academic dishonesty may be justified.
Attachment:- Scientists-behaving-badly.rar