Purpose

In each case study, you will complete multiple parts; some case studies have two parts and some have three. Specific instructions are outlined in each case study below.

Case Study Sections

Part 1

Review the website below and respond to the questions. Your response should be a minimum of 200 words, but may not exceed 350 words.

You are applying for the job of sales associate. You have just found out that you will be given a personality assessment as part of the application process. You feel that this job requires someone who is very high in extraversion and who can handle stress well. You are relatively sociable and can cope with some stress, but honestly you are not very high in either trait. The job pays well, and it is a great stepping-stone to better jobs. How are you going to respond when completing the personality questions? Are you going to make an effort to represent yourself as you truly are? If so, there is a chance that you may not get the job. How about answering the questions to fit the salesperson profile? Isn't everyone doing this to some extent anyway?

1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of responding to the questions honestly?

2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of responding to the questions in a way that matches what you think the company is looking for in a candidate?

3. What would you really do in a situation like this?

Part 2

Review the website below and respond to the questions. Your response should be a minimum of 200 words, but may not exceed 350 words.
Review the OB in "Action Case Study: How Not to Run an HR Department," found on page 165 of the textbook, Organizational Behaviour. Provide your response to the questions at the end of the case study.

How to Proceed

Your submission should be 1.5 spaced, with a 12-point font.

Your submission should be 1.5 spaced, with a 12-point font. Full student and assessment identification must be included with your submission.

Please note the minimum and maximum words outlined in each case study detail above.

OB in Action Case Study - How Not To Run an HR Department

Discussion Questions

1. Refer to any of the content theories to predict which need is being threatened for the 30 percent remaining managers on the job. Which need is being indirectly threatened for the non-managerial employees?

2. What kind of inequity do employees experience when HR department recruitment, selection, and promotion processes are perceived as being biased? Explain.

3. What level of expectancy can be predicted for the remaining 30 percent supervisors?

4. In your opinion, is this case about low employee motivation as a result of poor job design, lack of employee goal setting, or not enough flexibility built in to the position? Explain.

Attachment:- Case.rar