Q. A Canadian citizen whose son (resident of Ontario) died from the medication sues Robins & Robins in a California court. The court there is well known for being victim friendly also providing huge payouts to victim families. In Canada, the cap on no pecuniary damages is around $300,000. Punitive damages in Canada are rarely allowed. Robins & Robins move to dismiss the case under the theory of sovereign immunity. Will Robins & Robins win this motion using this theory? Explain why or explain why not?
Q. Addition of information to consumer or prospect records for the purpose of better describing or better determining the responsiveness of consumers or prospects.