Q. A Canadian citizen whose son (resident of Ontario) died from the medication sues Robins & Robins in a California court. The court there is well known for being victim friendly and providing huge payouts to victim families. In Canada, the cap on no pecuniary damages is around $300,000. Punitive damages in Canada are rarely allowed. Robins & Robins move to dismiss the case under the theory of sovereign immunity. Will Robins & Robins win this motion using this theory? Explain why or explain why not?