Please readd the case before answering the question.

https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/2011/12/111221scanscoutdo.pdf

Now that you've had a chance to review the ScanScout case in general, it's time to focus on the relevant facts. The key word there is "relevant." Not all facts in a case are relevant facts, though typically an appellate opinion focuses most on the relevant ones.

When you read the ScanScout case, you will see a section in the case with the general facts that brought this case to court in the first place. Those facts will address "what happened" in the case. On other words, you will be looking for statements relating what one party has accused the other of doing.

Your assignment this week is to review the case and find the relevant facts. Do not confuse this section with the "issue." The issue section will be discussed later in this course. The facts only focus on what happened. The issue focuses on the question presented to the court. For this assignment, only find the facts and not the issue. To focus on the facts, make sure you think about what happened that led to this case. What was ScanScout accused of doing? What exactly led to the accusation here? Those are the facts you should be focused on.

You may choose to list the facts or write them out in paragraph form. When you submit your final case brief, your facts section must be in paragraph form but for this assignment, either is fine. Your finished work must be no less than 200 words. If you find yourself running short, then expand on your explanation of the facts.

Case briefs never have references. The appellate opinion is the only document you review when you write a case brief.