Part one- Peer review

After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:

In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why.

How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response.

Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?

As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information?

Part two-Source summary:

Summary Assignment

The purpose of the following assignment is to effectively summarize and attribute information from a source.

Use the library databases to retrieve an article from the Course Theme Reading List on the topic you selected last week. If you are considering a new topic, confirm your choice with your professor. Once you retrieve the article, print it or save a local copy of the full text article to your hard drive so that you can refer to the contents of the article offline.

Read the source carefully, noting the thesis, topic sentences, headings, supporting details, and conclusion. To become more skilled at summary and paraphrase, you will practice writing summaries of different lengths on the same assigned source.

For each part of the assignment, follow the instructions provided.

Attachment:- Peer_Review_PPT.rar

Attachment:- Summary Directions and Document Format.rar