1. Evaluate the actions of the workers and management of Union Carbide in this case from the perspectives of System 1 and System 2 thinking that was discussed earlier?

2. The document uncovered by the Environmental Working Group Report refers to the acceptable business risk in the Bhopal operation due to questions about the technology. Is it ethical for a company to use business risk as a measure of whether to go ahead with an operation that may have safety problems? How would you characterize such a thought process from the perspective of ethical reasoning?

3. Evaluate management decision-making in the Bhopal case from a corporate governance perspective. Compare the decision-making process used by Union Carbide to deal with its disaster with that of Ford Motor Co. and Johnson & Johnson in the Tylenol incident as described in this chapter. How do you assess stakeholder responsibilities in each of these cases?