Mimi took her granddaughter to Roller Coaster World theme park often to ride the Thriller Diller roller coaster. The roller coaster is in a fenced, gated area. Customers pay for the ride as they board the Thriller Diller, or at the end of the ride as they leaved the gated area. On Saturday, Mimi and her granddaughter boarded the Thriller Diller, and waved at the attendant as the ride began. At the end of the ride, Mimi refused to pay for the ride. The most likely conclusion is that:

A. Mimi’s actions implied that she intended to pay for the ride; she is legally bound to pay for the ride.

B. Mimi’s actions implied that she intended to pay for the ride, but she is not legally bound to pay as there was no written agreement, or evidence of an agreement, such as a ticket for the ride.

C. Applying the subjective intent test, Mimi is not bound to pay for the ride because she and the attendant did not discuss the need for paying for a ticket for the ride.

D. Applying the objective test, there was no clearly communicated offer and acceptance, thus no enforceable contract; Mimi is not bound to pay for the ride.