Ask Operation Management Expert

Megan Mondale recently joined the supply department of Cupertini Industries (CUPERTINI ). Megan had been a supply manager in a machine shop in the nearby town of Clarence. While at the machine shop, she completed her MBA degree with a major in supply chain management. Her new job with CUPERTINI resulted in a handsome increase in salary and a great potential for promotion. Megan’s first assignment at CUPERTINI was supply manager for all purchased components for CUPERTINI ’s line of power mowers. Megan’s new boss and the individual responsible for hiring her was Gayton Lowery, the supply manager.

Megan received as her first major buying assignment the purchase of a metal housing for a 19-inch power mower. Her previous experience had given her a familiarity with drawings and specifications, particularly as they were related to sheet metal work. She was not disturbed at all by the magnitude of the assignment. It involved not only a high-priced assembly, but also a major investment in tools. Megan requested advice from Mr. Lowery as to those sources that could fabricate the housing at low cost. Mr. Lowery gave her the names, addresses, and contacts for four companies currently in the business of manufacturing this type of product, and recommended that they be sent drawings and specifications.

On receipt of the drawings, all the potential suppliers visited Miss Mondale to make sure that all the details were understood and to offer helpful suggestions as to ways in which the housing could be made at a lower cost. In the meetings that ensued, both Miss Mondale and Mr. Lowery discussed the details with the suppliers and the design engineer. At that time it was pointed out very clearly by Miss Mondale that this housing purchase was highly competitive, that other sources were also quoting on the same drawings and specifications, and that the power mower was a low- profit-margin item. Accordingly, the company was forced to make every conceivable effort by negotiation of design and price to purchase the housing at the rock-bottom price. She also pointed out that there would be substantial volume over a period of twelve to eighteen months, which should make the business very attractive. In a few days following these separate meetings, quotations were received from the suppliers. Miss Mondale carefully reviewed them, with the resultant determination on her part to place the business with the lowest bidder who apparently would meet all the drawing and specification requirements. The low bidder, the Bullworth Iron Works, quoted $19.56. The next lowest bidder, the Madison Machine Company quoted $19.80. The other two companies were over $21.00 and were not given any consideration by Miss Mondale.

In the course of a discussion about the placement of this business, Miss Mondale was quite surprised to find that Mr. Lowery did not consider that the business was ready for placement. He contended that the price of $19.56 was too high, and that the business should really be placed with the Madison Machine Company. Miss Mondale argued with Mr. Lowery that, inasmuch as the suppliers had been told that they must bid at the lowest possible price, they had negotiated out all of the design features possible. The price must be right. She saw no reason for procrastination or further discussion. Mr. Hack-man, on the other hand, calmly stated that they were now in a position for the first time really to negotiate the purchase and that Miss Mondale should go back to the low bidders and tell them that their prices were too high and that they should submit new quotations. Miss Mondale stated that she was of the opinion that this was unfair to the Bullworth Iron Works. She felt the quotations were already based on the suppliers making a fair profit and that such a quotation might injure their opportunity to negotiate further business with these suppliers. Mr. Lowery agreed that any company that does not receive the business is apt to be unhappy regardless of the circumstances, but he would not agree that the question of profit should concern the buying firm. After all, no consideration was being given to the profitability of the power mower, which had already been clearly defined as marginal.

Mr. Lowery further explained to Miss Mondale that it was highly desirable for the business to be placed with the Madison Machine Company as the Bullworth Iron Works was already making all the other mower housings. Unless the company provided some split of the business, it would lose its negotiating effectiveness for future business (it being accepted by the suppliers that no one but the Bullworth Iron Works could get business from Cupertini Industries). Mr. Lowery further explained that the company was not in a position to pay Madison more than Bullworth and that the negotiations should be conducted to ensure not only that Madison Machine Company received the business but that it was the low bidder. The degree of determination on the part of Mr. Lowery that this must be true, and the lack of acceptance by Miss Mondale of the fact that it either could or should be done, resulted in Mr. Lowery taking over the completion of the negotiations with both the Bullworth and Madison companies.

The net result of this second-look negotiation was that the business was placed with the Madison Machine Company at a price of $18.60. The initial and revised bids are as follows:

Initial bid

Bullworth Iron Works $19.56 Madison Machine Co. $19.80

Second bid

Bullworth $18.75 Madison$18.60

Change

Bullworth–$0.81 Madison–$1.20

Miss Mondale was very upset on two counts: Her supervisor had proved that additional costs could be taken out of the part, and supplier relations had apparently not been damaged or disturbed.

1. Why was Mr. Lowery able to reduce the price? How did he know that a reduction was possible?

2. Did Miss Mondale employ competitive bidding or negotiation in getting the bids from the suppliers?

3. Can this type of buying/bidding approach be broadly applied to all commodities and industries?

4. Do you believe that either Miss Mondale or Mr. Lowery were right in disregarding the high initial bids submitted by the third and fourth companies?

5. Would you say whether supplier relations were damaged or disturbed.

Operation Management, Management Studies

  • Category:- Operation Management
  • Reference No.:- M92586016

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Operation Management

Conflictdefine functional versus dysfunctional conflict in

Conflict Define functional versus dysfunctional conflict in a work group and explain how you can increase functional conflict and decrease dysfunctional conflict. Develop a response that includes examples and evidence to ...

For this assignment you will need to find 2 articles in

For this assignment, you will need to find 2 articles in business that can help describe what are IT strategic initiative being undertaken by an organization are like. Choose a different organization for each of the arti ...

Coping with problems joe is a little nervous he has just

Coping With Problems Joe is a little nervous. He has just been transferred from another plant to take over a production line. Production is down and there is a serious problem with absenteeism. To make matters worse, the ...

Over 30 years ago michael porter identified a holistic

Over 30 years ago Michael Porter identified a holistic approach to understanding how competitive forces shape strategy. He posited that the only way to truly insulate an organization from underlying economic volatility i ...

You are the contracting officer for an air-to-ground

You are the contracting officer for an air-to-ground missile development program. A contract for pre-production models of the missile was awarded by your predecessor and the contractor is behind schedule. In a program me ...

The ikea case provides an excellent opportunity to apply

The IKEA case provides an excellent opportunity to apply strategic management concepts to a large privately-held company that is expanding into India. IKEA is a Netherlands-based Swedish company with a presence in 44 cou ...

Can you answer for me the following questions about social

Can you answer for me the following questions about social loafing and the three main causes of free-riding. 1. Give a description of the phenomenon of social loafing. 2. Give a description of the phenomenon of free-ridi ...

1 analyzing the bridgestonefirestone and ford motor company

1. Analyzing the Bridgestone/Firestone and Ford motor company, is it sufficient to use the ISO/QS 9000 standards as the main basis of vendor/product selection? 2. What position to these cars company ( 1. Volkswagen, 2. F ...

Research the effect of primary and secondary seat belt laws

Research the effect of primary and secondary seat belt laws on the occurrence of motor-vehicle injuries and fatalities. Explain how epidemiologic studies influenced the development of current seat belt laws. Describe how ...

Please provide a brief paragrap of the key takaways from

Please provide a brief paragrap of the key takaways from each of the following topics: Designing Clear Visuals in business reports Designing Successful Documents and Websites Writing Winning Proposals

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As