Lane worked as the public assistance coordinator for the county. Her supervisor, Herald, received information that Lane was engaged in food stamp fraud. She was fired after Herald searched her office and found evidence against her. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this case?

A. Lane’s rights have been violated because she was an at-will employee and the search was per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

B. Lane has no recourse because Herald had reasonable grounds to suspect that the search would reveal she was engaged in food stamp fraud.

C. Lane has a legal recourse under the Privacy Act.

D. Lane has a legal claim for invasion of privacy.