In today’s workplace, it is expected that workers will encounter technology in some form. There are varied perspectives regarding the use of technology in the workplace. In this assignment, you will assess two of these perspectives by presenting a debate of those perspectives and concluding with your assessment of the preferred perspective.
Directions:
In a paper of 1,000-1,250 words, debate two opposing perspectives on technology in the workplace. Structure your paper as a debate as follows:
Introduction
First perspective
Rebuttal to first perspective
Second perspective
Rebuttal to second perspective
Concluding remarks (including your assessment of the most appropriate perspective)
Special Instructions:
Two perspectives are presented and are divergent enough to encourage lively debate. Current scholarly research is presented in support of both perspectives.
Two rebuttals are presented and show breadth and depth of knowledge that encourage lively debate. Current scholarly research is presented in support of both rebuttals.
Concluding remarks are presented, valid, and on topic. An assessment of the most appropriate perspective is presented, and it is supported with current, scholarly research.
Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.