In recent years, the use of forensic evidence has become more commonplace in criminal cases. In using forensic evidence, examiners use fingerprints, lip prints, and DNA analysis. DNA evidence was used to catch some of the most heinous murderers in America. For example, bite marks were used to identify and convict Theodore Bundy of numerous murders in the state of Florida.

In light of these events, do you believe palm prints, lip prints, and bite marks, alone, are sufficient enough evidence to sustain a conviction?
Support your answer using a credible source. Perform an Internet search to find a news article covering a case where bite, lip, or palm prints were used in the conviction.

Provide the link to the Internet source used to submit your posting.