In a case in which the employee claimed harassment by her supervisor in which he altered her work her work hours with the knowledge that doing so would adversely affect her hypoglycemia; frequently stood at her desk and stared angrily at her; startled her by pounding on her desk with his fist; criticized her work unfairly; and yelled at her in front of co-workers, the court ruled that:

A. no sexual harassment was proven, because no demand for sexual favors was made

B. no sexual harassment was proven, because no hostile environment was created

C. a hostile environment was created by the supervisor’s conduct

D. no harassment could be proven without verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature