William is an 87-year old resident of a skilled facility in a small town. He is single and consists of only 1 living relative, a 35-year old nephew who is a strong supporter of the individual's right to die. William came to the NSF 4 months ago after a stroke which left him not able to talk and paralyzed on the right side. He has become unresponsive. He has a little appetite and denies hydration. His doctor has given him IV nutrition and hydration however it is quickly becoming difficult to find out intact veins. He has never given any indication of his wishes; however his nephew insists that he doesn't want to live "like this" and "his time has come, and he should be let go." An NG tube was unsuccessful as he repeatedly eliminates it. The facility's policy is to follow the individual's wishes if they are known. The staff members caring for him insist that aside from the effects of the stroke, little is really wrong with him.

Illustrate your analysis of the different ethical considerations comprised in this situation? How must the competing ethical considerations be solved? Argue both sides of the issue, basing your arguments on the ethical theories and/or principles. CITE SOURCES!