problem 1:

a) How far can schools institutionalize local action via transformational empowerment and social cohesion and help low attaining schools in socially drawbacks areas? Give illustrations to substantiate your answer.

b) describe the extent to which the participatory role of the community would need support methods, namely: a whole range of formal and informal networks, a framework of information, multiple partnerships and a developmental space to allow dialogic openness and mutual learning. Describe your answer with illustrations.

problem 2: The low capacity archetypical school leaders fall short of the mark with respect to bringing the community closer and closer to the school. While the high capacity school leaders who have undergone the stages of instruction can adopt powerful strategies to enlist the support of parents for school enhancement.

Analyze these statements with respect to the capabilities of school leaders in building relationships in and across communities.

problem 3: Given the present demand, schools will have to undergo institutional transformation, innovate, form cultural identities and trust across distance and accomplish self-reliance to contribute to expansive learning of the community. Give illustrations to support your answer.

problem 4: How far can the management of education be more sensitive to public opinion and client demand? Additionally, consider the techniques of communication which facilitates the involvement of the broad school community to a World Class Education.