In Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry a store clerk who gave an illegal discount to a customer was interrogated by security personnel. The court held that-

A) her false imprisonment claim wasn't properly dismissed because the employer had proof that she gave the unauthorized discount.

B) she could go to trial on her insult claim because false damaging accusations were made in the presence of others.

C) she could go to trial on her hateful prosecution claim because the employer pressed criminal charges against her.

D) she could go to trial on her infliction of expressive distress claim because she was very upset by the interrogator's questioning of her