Q. Fred Witt owned a Ford Bronco. Steve Rosen operated a used car lot. Witt delivered his automobile to Rosen, asking him to resell it if he could. Witt specified that he wanted all cash for his car, not cash plus a trade-in. Rosen sold car to Richard Park for $12,800, but took a trade-in as part payment. Rosen promised to deliver Bronco's certificate of title to Park within a few days, but never did. He was also obligated to deliver proceeds of sale to Witt also of course failed to do that. Park claimed that car was rightfully his. Witt argued that Park owned nothing because he never got title also because Witt never got his money. Who loses also explain why?