On Teleological Argument: o McCloskey claims that to get proof going, real indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed. Explain this standard of indisputability which he calls very conclusive objection. Is it reasonable? Can you offer the example of design that, while not essentially indisputable, you think gives strong evidence of designer of universe? McCloskey implies that evolution has displaced need for designer. Suppose evolution is true, for argument sake, how would you reply to McCloskey o McCloskey claims that presence of imperfection and evil in world argues against perfection of divine design or divine purpose in world. How might you reply to this charge by McCloskey?