I am having trouble with this case study that I'm learning about in one of my management classes. Please read the attached case and answer the following thoroughly in your own words:
1) Explain if there was a "reasonable risk" or "unreasonable risk" involved in this case.
2) Was the plaintiff acting prudently? Explain.
3) Explain the concept of "duty to warn" within the context of this case.
4) What do you recommend in order to eliminate or minimize the risk of such hazard?