In the course of operating their businesses, Young shaped an oral contract with Drury to buy several carloads of tomatoes. Drury inscribed a memorandum on his own letterhead for his personal records. The memo limited the terms of the agreement however was not signed by either party. Drury directed Young a copy for his records. Later Drury inscribed Young a letter stating he would not sell the tomatoes as agreed. Young charged in state court to enforce the contract. Drury struggled that the contract was subject to the Statute of Frauds as well as that because it was not signed, it couldn't be enforced. Young claimed that the memo as well as letter together constituted writings adequate to satisfy the Statute of Frauds. The court most probable held that the Statute of Frauds was#question..