Discussion Question

1. Review the case Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe (2003) in your text. In your response, explain why John Doe believed his due process rights had been violated. What were his main arguments? Did the Supreme Court agree with Doe, or did it agree with the State of Connecticut? Do you think that the Constitution should afford due process rights to sex offenders who have been convicted for sexual offenses against minors? Why or why not?

2. Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process. What is the substantive due process issue presented in Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)? What is the procedural due process issue presented in Connecticut v. Doe (2003)?

3. Earlier you were asked to contemplate the facts in Boddie v. Connecticut (1970). Discuss whether you believe Boddie presented a valid argument before the court. As you consider whether access to the courts is a valid due process issue, please design or amend the existing law that would ensure that all people have access to the courts.