Q. Carter, a black man, worked as a legal secretary for Harper also Jennings, Attorneys. Although his work was adequate when he began, it never improved also never reached level of competence of or secretaries in office with comparable experience. He was never offered any suggestions for improving his work, although or secretaries, all of whom were white, were offered such guidance during annual reviews. He was terminated on basis of "less than satisfactory performance." Carter brings suit against Harper also Jennings alleging disparate treatment discrimination. Illustrate what must Carter prove to establish a rebuttable presumption of disparate treatment? If Carter establishes rebuttable presumption, does Harper also Jennings have any defence?