Q. Burger Prince is one of the largest hamburger chains in the country also fiercely competitive with the well-known chain of Captain Hook Seafood House restaurants. Captain Hook recently introduced a new line of hamburgers in order to expalso beyond seafood. Burger Prince received information which it believed to be reliable indicating which Captain Hook's burgers contained a substantial amount of fillers. Burger Prince then ran advertisements saying which its pure beef burgers were better than Captain Hooks which used fillers. Which of the subsequent is true?
A. Captain Hook will not be able to win a product disparagement case here.
B. Burger Prince would be liable for invasion of privacy if the formula for Captain Hook's burgers was not publicly available.
C. This is a case of palming off.
D. Burger Prince is liable for product disparagement because the statement about the use of filler was false.