Ask Question, Ask an Expert

+61-413 786 465

info@mywordsolution.com

Ask Business Management Expert

An accident has occurred, causing $10,000 in harm to the victim. The amount of harm done is undisputed and easy to prove; punitive damages are not applicable, so any damage award would be for exactly $10,000.
This type of accident is governed by strict liability, so the injurer is legally responsible, but it may be difficult to prove in court that he caused the harm. The victim can hire a lawyer for $3,000 and go to trial, in which case he would have a 40% chance of winning. He could also hire an expert witness to testify. This would ensure victory at trial, but would cost an additional $10,000, for a total of $13,000. Going to trial costs the defendant (injurer) $5,000, regardless of whether the plaintiff (victim) hires an expert witness. Assume that neither party pays any legal expenses if an out-of-court settlement is reached.
First, consider the usual American rule where each party pays its own legal fees.
If the case goes to trial, will the plaintiff hire an expert witness or not?
Given your answer to (a), calculate
each party's threat point during pre-trial negotiations (which is its noncooperative payoff if the case goes to trial)
the gains from cooperation if a pre-trial settlement is reached
the settlement that would occur if the two parties agreed to divide the gains from cooperation evenly
In this scenario, would the American rule lead to over-, under-, or efficient precaution on the part of the injurer?
Next, consider the usual British rule where the losing party pays both sides' legal fees (including the cost of the expert witness, if he was hired).
If the case goes to trial, will the plaintiff hire an expert witness?
Given your answer to (d), answer the same three questions as before: calculate
each party's threat point
the gains from cooperation
the settlement that would occur if gains from cooperation were divided evenly
In this scenario, would the British rule lead to over-, under-, or efficient precaution on the part of the injurer?
Finally, consider the following cost-shifting rule, similar in spirit to Federal Rule 68. If the case goes to trial and no damages are awarded, each side pays its own expenses. If damages are awarded and are lower than a settlement offer the plaintiff (victim) refused, the plaintiff pays both sides' expenses. If damages are higher than a settlement offer the defendant (injurer) refused, the defendant pays both sides' expenses.
What will happen if the case goes to trial after the defendant offers to settle for $10,001? Is the plaintiff better off accepting this offer or going to trial?
What will happen if the case goes to trial after the plaintiff offers to settle for $9,999? Is the defendant better off accepting this offer or going to trial?
What do you expect to happen in pre-trial negotiations?
In this scenario, would this cost-shifting rule lead to over-, under-, or efficient precaution on the part of the injurer?

Business Management, Management Studies

  • Category:- Business Management
  • Reference No.:- M92102224
  • Price:- $25

Priced at Now at $25, Verified Solution

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Business Management

What is sustainability is there a relationship or link to

What is 'sustainability'? Is there a relationship or link to stakeholder theory and social responsibility?

Define disparate impact and disparate treatment how do they

Define disparate impact and disparate treatment. How do they differ?

Generallly while this discussion topic involves looking at

Generallly, while this discussion topic involves looking at some e-activities on Value-Added Health Services, and what they can mean to the patients; we can also look at further factors. Further, while the e-activity giv ...

Discuss the question of a common mortality that people of

Discuss the question of a common mortality that people of all nations could share. Is there one moral philosophy that seems to be applied across nations? If so which one and why? Not so, why? Share the individual standar ...

An over-supply of available workers and an under-supply of

An over-supply of available workers and an under-supply of qualified talent, legislation requirements of other countries, below average pay, baby boomers aging out of the work force, and small businesses hiring, but only ...

Explain why monopolistic competition earn only a normal

Explain why monopolistic competition earn only a normal profit in the long run.

Ellen is an anthropologist who has been working at olduvai

Ellen is an anthropologist who has been working at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania for the past six months. She has been conducting research on the Internet. She finds a Web site with an article that proposes a revolutionary t ...

A stringmaybesplitintotwo substringsof equal

A string may be split into two substrings of equal lengths if the length of the string is an even integer. However, if the length of the string is odd, the length of the first half should be one less than the length of t ...

Is there any difference in terms of the information that

Is there any difference in terms of the information that could be provided to the decision maker by an IS that was created using HSM and an IS that was created using SSM?

Nordstrom inc is a seattle-based department store rivaling

Nordstrom Inc. is a Seattle-based department store rivaling the likes of Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, and Bloomingdale's. Nordstrom is a Hall of Fame member of  Fortune  magazine's "100 Best Companies to Work For" l ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As