Answer the subsequent question

1. In Petit v. City of Chicago the court trusted on the decision in Grutter v. Bollinger to determine the legality of the actions of the City of Chicago in administering tests utilized to promote police officers to the rank of sergeant. Which of the subsequent was NOT a reasoning relied upon by the judges?

A. Standardizing test results by race is comparable to race norming and is therefore unconstitutional

B. The City of Chicago was up to show a compelling interest in diversity justifying Chicago's affirmative action plan

C. Adjusting the test scores to validate the increased percentage of minority officer promotions eliminated an advantage that white officers had and didn't create an arbitrary advantage to minority officers

D. Chicago's affirmative action plan concerning this test was limited in time as well as narrowly construed as required in order to be valid