A research proposal is an overview of the argument contained in your working thesis statement, sometimes called a hypothesis. It is not based on research, but on what you already know, or think you know, about your topic.
If done well, a research proposal will almost serve as a preliminary outline of your paper. It offers your working thesis (hypothesis) and explanation, which should list the points you want to make. The sub-points are the main points of your paper. And the objections represent the other side of the argument.
This is a good time to reconsider the initial thoughts you had earlier in the module about your thesis (or hypothesis): do you need to rewrite it? If you have trouble filling in the sections below, an improperly formed thesis might be the problem.
The research proposal has 5 parts:
Working Thesis: a one-sentence paragraph; no introduction is necessary.
Explanation: a statement that includes the points you think you will be discussing in your paper.
Subpoints: each sub-point explains more fully a point mentioned in your explanation.
Possible Objections: a brief discussion of the opposition's point of view.
Reply to Objections: your brief answer to the opposition.
Your research proposal should look like the five parts listed above. The number of sub-points may vary, but if you have only two, you may not have enough material for a good paper. For a simple undergraduate paper, limit your sub-points to 4 or 5.
The point of this exercise is to give you a focus, to force you to think about your topic independently of any research you may do or have done. This will probably serve as a basis for your paper, although it is quite likely that, once you begin your research, some of your ideas will change. That is the point of research: working to find an answer to a question!
Although your early research may have given you some great information, it is not necessary to rely on research for a good research proposal: you are simply outlining the argument that you expect to make in your final paper.
A good research proposal follows the standard format described in this module.
Save your research proposal as lastname_firstinitial_M1A3.doc and submit it to theM1: Assignment 3 Dropbox by Tuesday, February 16, 2016. All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.
| Assignment 3 Grading Criteria |
Maximum Points |
| Working Thesis (making your claim clear) |
12 |
| Explanation (what do you expect to cover in your argument) |
12 |
| Sub-points (explaining the points covered above) |
14 |
| Possible Objections (what does the "other side" think) |
16 |
| Response to Objections (how do you plan to answer those objections listed above) |
16 |
| Format (have you presented this information in APA style, and in a way that your reader can easily follow) |
10 |
| Usage and Mechanics: Grammar, Spelling, Sentence Structure |
10 |
|
Style: Audience, Voice, Word Choice
|
10 |
| Total: |
100 |
How can you know if you have done well with this assignment?
|
This criteria:
|
Is well written if:
|
|
Working Thesis(making your claim clear)
|
You state your thesis (your main point) in a single, declarative sentence that can be argued using scholarly research. Your thesis is neither too narrow nor too broad. You use no conjunctions.
|
|
Explanation (what do you expect to cover in your argument)
|
You offer a short overview of the main points that you expect to cover in your paper.
|
|
Subpoints (explaining the points covered above in detail)
|
You expand on your overview, with a statement of what you already know about the subject that supports your claim, as well as areas where you will need to do research to fill in your knowledge.
|
|
Possible Objections(What does the "other side" think?)
|
You fairly and completely offer the strongest arguments against your position.
|
|
Response to Objections (How do you plan to answer those objections to your thesis listed above?)
|
You offer your possible responses to the objections listed above. You avoid fallacious argumentation and note the areas where the other side is correct.
|
|
Format (Have you followed APA style, and presented this information in a way that your reader can easily follow?)
|
Your proposal is saved in Microsoft Word®, with an APA style title page. You have five headings (THESIS, EXPLANATION, SUBPOINTS, OBJECTIONS, REPLY TO OBJECTIONS) in capital letters and in the order listed here.
|
|
Vocabulary, grammar and punctuation, voice, and word choice. (Are you presenting this work in an academic manner?)
|
You use appropriate language, avoiding wordiness, while giving the reader all necessary information. You have no spelling, punctuation, sentence, apostrophe, or homophone errors. You remain in the third person voice.
|