1. What is wrong with the following statement: “The jury determined that Walter was lying when he said the parties had orally agreed on an employment deal; however, based on Walter's appearance and behavior on the witness stand, the appellate court determined he had told the truth.” Fully explain your answer.

2. Eve is walking to work along a sidewalk next to a road. A National Distribution Company (NDC) truck strikes and injures Eve, causing her injuries that result in substantial medical bills and pain for Eve. Eve is a resident of California, where the accident occurred. NDC has its principal place of business, and is incorporated, in New York. In what state’s courts may Eve sue NDC? Explain why those state(s) have jurisdiction over this case. (If there is more than one state that would have jurisdiction, state all of them).