1. In chapter 2, Anheier references a view of US history as a constant struggle to balance the "cultural narrative that all citizens are equal and have equal chances of success versus the de facto inequality in terms of life chances and access to opportunities (27)." As you have previously read, and may have noted prior to this course, many nonprofits focus on advocacy and on trying to address injustice and inequality. As a nation which was created to further democratic principles and to replace former aristocratic distinctions with the opportunity for economic mobility, is this struggle part of the reason why we might need nonprofits? Is there a role for nonprofits in promoting justice? Or, should they focus on basic charity such as feeding the hungry?

2. Do we really have to define what it means to be a nonprofit? Is it enough to set parameters, or create a basic underlying legal definition? Do we limit the possibility of new, innovative models through an emphasis on categorization?

3. The Anheier text notes that voluntary associations in the late 19th century, and 20th century, worked together towards collective action. At this point in time, there are many national and international organizations within the sector. How does the scale and scope of an organization impact its ability to meet its mission? Think of both positive and negative impacts.