Ask Question, Ask an Expert

+61-413 786 465

info@mywordsolution.com

Ask Business Law & Ethics Expert

You are currently a third year law student working as a summer intern for the largest law firm in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Your mentor and senior attorney introduces you to a new client, Ronald Crump, the owner of Crump International, a large multinational organization with diverse businesses in real estate, construction, travel, entertainment, media, and other communication networks. As the owner of this large organization, Crump is looking to your firm to handle all of his legal needs.

You learn the following from your meetings with Crump:

  • The construction division recently hired a former high-ranking official from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ensure environmental regulations are followed. Crump is concerned about the EPA's proposed rule that will require the construction division to obtain additional permits and conduct more frequent inspections. The agency published the rule in the Federal Register last week. These new permits will create more work and expense for Crump. The former EPA employee indicated that he knows people at the EPA who might be able to make the proposed rule disappear in exchange for contributions to fund the newly created environmental training facility in California.
  • The Crump Resort in Allentown, Pennsylvania (CRAP) is being sued by Josie McDonald for premise liability (negligence) and emotional stress due to bedbug bites during her stay at CRAP. Crump maintains that his resort properties are held to the highest standards and that he intends to file a countersuit because McDonald created a blog where she made false statements about the CRAP being infested with bedbugs. McDonald made similar disparaging remarks to the local television station in Allentown.
  • Crump is famous for his reality show called "The Intern" as well as his favorite phrases "You're Fired" as he sends interns packing and "You're Hired" for those who survive the grueling business boot camp. Crump wants to make sure his phrases are protected from use by others without permission. Crump reminds you that this protection should extend use in the United States and in other countries.
  • Instead of working for her father, Crump's daughter Erica applied for a position as associate attorney with the firm of Slippe, Faul, & Sioux, a law firm specializing in personal injury law in Atlantic City, New Jersey. On September 15, the firm offered Erica an employment contract for one year with a yearly salary of $75,000 starting on October 1. The contract contained the following provisions.
    • Erica could not be terminated during the term of employment unless she committed an illegal act.
    • Any disputes would be resolved using mediation selected by the law firm.
    • Erica would not be permitted to work for any law firm within a 100-mile radius of Atlantic City for two years after leaving the firm.
  • Erica accepted the job and signed the contract the same day. Erica decided to keep the news secret until she returned from vacation the following week. On September 17, Crump offered to give Slippe all of his legal business related to personal injury if the law firm hired Erica. The firm accepted. When Erica told her father the news about getting the job on September 15, Crump refused to transfer any legal work to the firm. The law firm filed a suit against Crump, citing the parties had a contract. When Erica showed up for work on October 1, the law firm informed her that they no longer needed her services. One week later, Erica found another job with Tweady & Byrd, a firm specializing in entertainment law located about five miles from Slippe, Faul, & Sioux.
  • Mark Holmes, a director in the real estate division, met with Ben Franklin, 80-years-old, about purchasing a large tract of land owned by Franklin in New Jersey. Crump International planned to bulldoze the acreage to create a new golf resort. During the meeting, Holmes noticed several brochures about Alzheimer's as well as several prescription bottles sitting on the table. After discussing the good old days for several hours, Holmes and Franklin agreed on the sale of the land for $1,500,000. Since Holmes brought a blank copy of a contract with him, he helped Franklin complete the paperwork and both parties signed. Unbeknownst to either party, the purchase price was written as $150,000. On the day before the closing, Holmes called Franklin to remind him of the location. Holmes said he didn't know anything about selling that land and he had no intention of selling his land to some big city slicker.

Based on the scenario, create a 8- to 9-page Microsoft Word document. The document should serve as an interoffice memorandum to the firm's senior attorney. In addition, the document should address the following and any others issues you may discover:

  • What happens when a government agency proposes a rule? What would you recommend Crump do in response to the EPA's proposed rule that was published last week?
  • Should Crump make a contribution to the environmental training center? Why or why not?
  • Will Crump win the negligence lawsuit filed by McDonald? Why?
  • Should Crump file the countersuit for the blog and remarks McDonald made on television? If yes, on what basis? If not, why not?
  • Are the phrases "You're Fired" and "You're Hired" considered intellectual property? If yes, what type? If not, why not? Are there any issues with protecting these phrases in the U.S. and in foreign countries?
  • What is the status of the employment contract between Erica and Slippe, Faul, & Sioux?
  • Will the noncompete provision be enforceable? Why or why not?
  • What is the status of the agreement between Crump and Slippe, Faul, & Sioux?
  • Do Holmes and Franklin have a valid contract? What are the basic requirements for contract formation? What defects in the contract formation process may have occurred?

Business Law & Ethics, Finance

  • Category:- Business Law & Ethics
  • Reference No.:- M9785280

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Business Law & Ethics

Australian commercial law assessment - part a 300 words -in

AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSESSMENT - PART A (300 words) - In using the resources of the early Modules, your tribe discussed and developed a constitution. In the new constitution assume that there are rules protecting a ...

Assignment - advanced financial accounting1 classification

Assignment - Advanced Financial Accounting 1. 'Classification of liabilities is based on the same principles as the classification of assets.' Do you agree with this? Why or why not? 2. 'Classification of liabilities as ...

Introduction to business law assessment -case - garcia v

INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW ASSESSMENT - CASE - Garcia v NAB Introduction of relevant background of the issue, explanation and setting out the argument/theme, key issues and the structure that follows. Identification of ...

Assignment -purpose - this significant task requires

Assignment - Purpose - This significant task requires forward planning and adequate time for research, reading and reflecting. The purpose of the assignment is to enable you to achieve outcomes in knowledge, skill and ap ...

The good cop click on the tab and read the journal essay

The Good Cop." Click on the tab and read the journal essay. Pay particular attention to II The Third Way: Rightful Policing. In the essay, the author makes the case for, what she terms, "rightful policing." What is right ...

Exerciseform yourselves into groups and consider the

Exercise Form yourselves into groups and consider the question: What is research? Write a list of 5 characteristics of research. What are the characteristics of research at postgraduate level? Scholarship: "The analysis ...

Question 1it has been said that good corporate governance

Question 1 It has been said that good corporate governance is an important ingredient in corporate success and that regulators should encourage good corporate governance. Required Discuss how good corporate governance is ...

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law explain the

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law. Explain the purpose of the law of torts in contract to the purposes of criminal law. Why are they different? Support your answer using specific examples from the textbook.

Australian commercial and corporations law assignment -this

Australian Commercial and Corporations Law Assignment - This assignment deals with critical problem solving skills. This assessment tests course objectives addressing: Knowledge of relevant law, Application of the law to ...

Business law assignment question -mabo has been said to a

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mabo has been said to a cornerstone of the Australian legal system. Your response must discuss the following: 1. Discussion of the Mabo (No 2) case. 2. Explain the impacts of the case o ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As