Ask Business Law & Ethics Expert

Question:

Bernie Madoff

Bernard Madoff and his securities firm were an operation that, for over eighteen years, managed to lose $50 billion in investors' funds. Madoff, the former chairman of NASDAQ, was able to dupe employees, regulators, and of course investors, with nothing more sophisticated than a Ponzi scheme for eighteen years. When Mr. Madoff was indicted for federal securities fraud,Madoff's lawyer offered, "We will fight to get through this unfortunate series of events."

Madoff was an iconic CEO. He was instrumental in creating NASDAQ and had served as a board member at NASD, the precursor organization to FINRA. Even Arthur Levitt Jr., the former head of the SEC for eight years, was known to consult with Madoff on market issues. In classic Ponzi fashion, when anyone questioned his operation, he gave the person money back. People clamored to get their money invested with Bernie.

Madoff kept his operations close. Madoff's direct reports were from his sons and brother. Madoff limited access to the seventeenth floor of his headquarters, the Lipstick Building, where the supposed trading computer was housed. However, the computer was terribly outdated. No one ever wondered why it was never replaced. The reason was simple: a new computer would require someone looking at the old computer and transferring files-files for nonexistent trades.

No one ever wondered why such a large investment firm employed a strip-mall accountant. No one ever wondered how Madoff was able to use only twenty people to do the work that would have required 200 in another firm. They just knew that only those twenty people ever got access to the seventeenth floor. The SEC was in to investigate at least three times, but the red flags were not obvious. Madoff even commented on how his niece had married an investigator from the SEC.

The seventeenth floor was where the money of investors such as Mort Zuckerman, Kevin Bacon, and many of Palm Beach's movers and shakers was never really invested but was funneled to Madoff and the charities he favored. Madoff contributed to his church, universities, and so many philanthropies that he was known in both New York and Florida for his generosity. Madoff followed the pattern of all Ponzi schemers. They never begin with the idea of a fraud. Indeed, Madoff was even more true to form. He offered good, but not excessive returns. He was a consistent performer with a steady 12 percent-enough to be better than the rest, but not enough to turn regulatory heads too far in the direction of the seventeenth floor.

Ponzi schemers continue to believe that they are just one dramatic trade or market move from pulling a "rabbit out of a hat" and making it all work for everyone. Generally, Ponzi schemes last no longer than one year. Mr. Ponzi himself made it for only nine months. Madoff lasted eighteen years. There were those outside the regulatory agencies as well as New York's and Palm Beach's movers and shakers who were wondering. For example, Harry Markopolos wrote in a November 7, 2005, e-mail to the SEC of his concerns about the Madoff operations and concluded, "Madoff Investment Securities LLC is likely a Ponzi scheme." The SEC investigated and closed its investigation eleven months later, writing, 'The staff found no evidence of fraud."

After entering a guilty plea, Madoff was sentenced to l50 years in prison. The federal judge who sentenced him said that Madoff's conduct was "extraordinary evil." The Ponzi scheme is the largest in history. The sentence is three times longer than what was recommended by the prosecution and ten times longer than what Madoff's lawyers proposed. Mrs. Madoff was required to vacate the couple's penthouse apartment, and U.S. Marshalls took possession of it. The Madoff's assets, including properties in the Hamptons, Palm Beach, and Switzerland, are being sold, with the funds being used to compensate victims of the fraud as well as pay the fines imposed by the judge. Madoff turned to the courtroom full of his victims and said that he was sorry but, "I know that doesn't help you." Mr. Madoff blamed his pride for his actions, stating that he could not bring himself to admit his failure as a money manager and that he created the Ponzi scheme to cover up his shortcoming in terms of the returns on investments of his clients.

Questions:

1. Mr. Markopolos was dismissed by his bosses and friends even as he provided a lot of twenty-eight red flags. What do we learn from his experience about raising questions on the accounting and returns of companies? What can we learn about the reception whistleblowers receive? Did the market, regulators, and investors not want to raise questions because of the steady returns Madoff provided? What role does a questioning attitude play in preventing company collapses?

2. Should investors have suspected the continuing higher levers of returns that never faltered?

3. The Madoff empire could not have lasted as long as it did without complicity from employees. Mr Madoff's second-in-command, Frank DiPascali, who entered a guilty plea, told the federal judge,

I'm standing here to say that from the early 1990's until December 2008, i helped Bernie Madoff and other people carry out a fraud. I knew no trades were happening I knew what I was doing was criminal. But I did it anyway.

Mr. DiPascali's compensation was $2 million per year. He had not completed college at the time Mr. Madoff hired him in the early years of the firm. What might have helped Mr.DiPascali resist the temptation to participate in the fraud?

Business Law & Ethics, Finance

  • Category:- Business Law & Ethics
  • Reference No.:- M91923303
  • Price:- $15

Priced at Now at $15, Verified Solution

Have any Question?


Related Questions in Business Law & Ethics

Assignment -purpose - this significant task requires

Assignment - Purpose - This significant task requires forward planning and adequate time for research, reading and reflecting. The purpose of the assignment is to enable you to achieve outcomes in knowledge, skill and ap ...

Group report1 this group assignment consists of 2 parts

GROUP REPORT 1. This group assignment consists of 2 parts. Part A is a case study on contract law, and Part B is a question involving Corporations Law. Both questions must be answered. 2. The total word limit for the gro ...

Managing the legal environment assignment - research

MANAGING THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT ASSIGNMENT - RESEARCH PROJECT Company: Nike (a) Summarise in about 250-500 words the characteristics/features of the organisation (you can choose a statutory/government body or select a bus ...

Corporations law - assignment questions -objectives -

CORPORATIONS LAW - ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS - Objectives - Answer the following questions with reference to the relevant statute law and general common law principles operating in Australia concerning the consequences of the ...

Business law assignment question -mabo has been said to a

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mabo has been said to a cornerstone of the Australian legal system. Your response must discuss the following: 1. Discussion of the Mabo (No 2) case. 2. Explain the impacts of the case o ...

Assignment - advanced financial accounting1 classification

Assignment - Advanced Financial Accounting 1. 'Classification of liabilities is based on the same principles as the classification of assets.' Do you agree with this? Why or why not? 2. 'Classification of liabilities as ...

Property law for business assignment question -mrs betty

PROPERTY LAW FOR BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT QUESTION - Mrs Betty Joyce lives in an old, war-time vintage army shed in Baldivis. When she started to live in the shed, in the early 1960s, the whole area was a remote backwater. Si ...

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law explain the

Compare and contrast tort law and criminal law. Explain the purpose of the law of torts in contract to the purposes of criminal law. Why are they different? Support your answer using specific examples from the textbook.

Assessment taskassignment questiondiscussi the main ways

Assessment Task Assignment question: Discuss: i. the main ways that a company may source finance; and ii. the benefits and costs associated with the main sources of corporate finance. Guidance - Students are to read text ...

Australian commercial and corporations law assignment -this

Australian Commercial and Corporations Law Assignment - This assignment deals with critical problem solving skills. This assessment tests course objectives addressing: Knowledge of relevant law, Application of the law to ...

  • 4,153,160 Questions Asked
  • 13,132 Experts
  • 2,558,936 Questions Answered

Ask Experts for help!!

Looking for Assignment Help?

Start excelling in your Courses, Get help with Assignment

Write us your full requirement for evaluation and you will receive response within 20 minutes turnaround time.

Ask Now Help with Problems, Get a Best Answer

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps even

Why might a bank avoid the use of interest rate swaps, even when the institution is exposed to significant interest rate

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and

Describe the difference between zero coupon bonds and coupon bonds. Under what conditions will a coupon bond sell at a p

Compute the present value of an annuity of 880 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 880 per year for 16 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As

Compute the present value of an 1150 payment made in ten

Compute the present value of an $1,150 payment made in ten years when the discount rate is 12 percent. (Do not round int

Compute the present value of an annuity of 699 per year

Compute the present value of an annuity of $ 699 per year for 19 years, given a discount rate of 6 percent per annum. As